* Update `build-dependencies` CI action
* Update `develop` to `patch-polkadot-sdk`
Allows us to finally remove the old `serai-dex/substrate` repository _and_
should have CI pass without issue on `develop` again.
The changes made here should be trivial and maintain all prior
behavior/functionality. The most notable are to `chain_spec.rs`, in order to
still use a SCALE-encoded `GenesisConfig` (avoiding `serde_json`).
* CI fixes
* Add `/usr/local/opt/llvm/lib` to paths on macOS hosts
* Attempt to use `LD_LIBRARY_PATH` in macOS GitHub CI
* Use `libp2p 0.56` in `serai-node`
* Correct Windows build dependencies
* Correct `llvm/lib` path on macOS
* Correct how macOS 13 and 14 have different homebrew paths
* Use `sw_vers` instead of `uname` on macOS
Yields the macOS version instead of the kernel's version.
* Replace hard-coded path with the intended env variable to fix macOS 13
* Add `libclang-dev` as dependency to the Debian Dockerfile
* Set the `CODE` storage slot
* Update to a version of substrate without `wasmtimer`
Turns out `wasmtimer` is WASM only. This should restore the node's functioning
on non-WASM environments.
* Restore `clang` as a dependency due to the Debian Dockerfile as we require a C++ compiler
* Move from Debian bookworm to trixie
* Restore `chain_getBlockBin` to the RPC
* Always generate a new key for the P2P network
* Mention every account on-chain before they publish a transaction
`CheckNonce` required accounts have a provider in order to even have their
nonce considered. This shims that by claiming every account has a provider at
the start of a block, if it signs a transaction.
The actual execution could presumably diverge between block building (which
sets the provider before each transaction) and execution (which sets the
providers at the start of the block). It doesn't diverge in our current
configuration and it won't be propagated to `next` (which doesn't use
`CheckNonce`).
Also uses explicit indexes for the `serai_abi::{Call, Event}` `enum`s.
* Adopt `patch-polkadot-sdk` with fixed peering
* Manually insert the authority discovery key into the keystore
I did try pulling in `pallet-authority-discovery` for this, updating
`SessionKeys`, but that was insufficient for whatever reason.
* Update to latest `substrate-wasm-builder`
* Fix timeline for incrementing providers
e1671dd71b incremented the providers for every
single transaction's sender before execution, noting the solution was fragile
but it worked for us at this time. It did not work for us at this time.
The new solution replaces `inc_providers` with direct access to the `Account`
`StorageMap` to increment the providers, achieving the desired goal, _without_
emitting an event (which is ordered, and the disparate order between building
and execution was causing mismatches of the state root).
This solution is also fragile and may also be insufficient. None of this code
exists anymore on `next` however. It just has to work sufficiently for now.
* clippy
The prior workflow (now deleted) required manually specifying the packages to
check and only checked the package could compile under the stated MSRV. It
didn't verify it was actually the _minimum_ supported Rust version. The new
version finds the MSRV from scratch to check if the stated MSRV aligns.
Updates stated MSRVs accordingly.
Also removes many explicit dependencies from secq256k1 for their re-exports via
k256. Not directly relevant, just part of tidying up all the `toml`s.
Relevant to #394.
Prevents hand-over due to hand-over occurring via a `Batch` publication.
Expects a new protocol to restore functionality (after a retirement of the
current protocol).
Resolves#353
Implements code such that:
- 80% of validators (by stake) must be in favor of a signal for the network to
be
- 80% of networks (by stake) must be in favor of a signal for it to be locked
in
- After a signal has been locked in for two weeks, the network halts
The intention is to:
1) Not allow validators to unilaterally declare new consensus rules.
No method of declaring new consensus rules is provided by this pallet. Solely a
way to deprecate the current rules, with a signaled for successor. All nodes
must then individually decide whether or not to download and run a new node
which has new rules, and if so, which rules.
2) Not place blobs on chain.
Even if they'd be reproducible, it's just a lot of data to chuck on the
blockchain.
