Merge BlockWithAcknowledgedBatch and BatchWithoutAcknowledgeBatch

Offers a simpler API to the coordinator.
This commit is contained in:
Luke Parker
2024-09-19 03:16:17 -04:00
parent 53567e91c8
commit c27aaf8658
6 changed files with 59 additions and 62 deletions

View File

@@ -16,14 +16,14 @@ use db::*;
pub(crate) fn queue_acknowledge_batch<S: ScannerFeed>(
txn: &mut impl DbTxn,
batch_id: u32,
in_instruction_succeededs: Vec<bool>,
in_instruction_results: Vec<messages::substrate::InInstructionResult>,
burns: Vec<OutInstructionWithBalance>,
key_to_activate: Option<KeyFor<S>>,
) {
SubstrateDb::<S>::queue_acknowledge_batch(
txn,
batch_id,
in_instruction_succeededs,
in_instruction_results,
burns,
key_to_activate,
)
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ impl<D: Db, S: ScannerFeed> ContinuallyRan for SubstrateTask<D, S> {
match action {
Action::AcknowledgeBatch(AcknowledgeBatch {
batch_id,
in_instruction_succeededs,
in_instruction_results,
mut burns,
key_to_activate,
}) => {
@@ -127,16 +127,16 @@ impl<D: Db, S: ScannerFeed> ContinuallyRan for SubstrateTask<D, S> {
let return_information = report::take_return_information::<S>(&mut txn, batch_id)
.expect("didn't save the return information for Batch we published");
assert_eq!(
in_instruction_succeededs.len(),
in_instruction_results.len(),
return_information.len(),
"amount of InInstruction succeededs differed from amount of return information saved"
);
// We map these into standard Burns
for (succeeded, return_information) in
in_instruction_succeededs.into_iter().zip(return_information)
for (result, return_information) in
in_instruction_results.into_iter().zip(return_information)
{
if succeeded {
if result == messages::substrate::InInstructionResult::Succeeded {
continue;
}