mirror of
https://github.com/serai-dex/serai.git
synced 2025-12-09 20:59:23 +00:00
Redesign Slash/SlashReport types with a function to calculate the penalty
This commit is contained in:
258
substrate/validator-sets/primitives/src/slash_points.rs
Normal file
258
substrate/validator-sets/primitives/src/slash_points.rs
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
|
||||
use core::{num::NonZero, time::Duration};
|
||||
|
||||
#[cfg(feature = "std")]
|
||||
use zeroize::Zeroize;
|
||||
|
||||
use scale::{Encode, Decode, MaxEncodedLen};
|
||||
use scale_info::TypeInfo;
|
||||
|
||||
#[cfg(feature = "borsh")]
|
||||
use borsh::{BorshSerialize, BorshDeserialize};
|
||||
#[cfg(feature = "serde")]
|
||||
use serde::{Serialize, Deserialize};
|
||||
|
||||
use sp_core::{ConstU32, bounded::BoundedVec};
|
||||
#[cfg(not(feature = "std"))]
|
||||
use sp_std::vec::Vec;
|
||||
|
||||
use serai_primitives::{TARGET_BLOCK_TIME, Amount};
|
||||
|
||||
use crate::{SESSION_LENGTH, MAX_KEY_SHARES_PER_SET_U32};
|
||||
|
||||
/// Each slash point is equivalent to the downtime implied by missing a block proposal.
|
||||
// Takes a NonZero<u16> so that the result is never 0.
|
||||
fn downtime_per_slash_point(validators: NonZero<u16>) -> Duration {
|
||||
Duration::from_secs(TARGET_BLOCK_TIME) * u32::from(u16::from(validators))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// A slash for a validator.
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, Debug, Encode, Decode, MaxEncodedLen, TypeInfo)]
|
||||
#[cfg_attr(feature = "std", derive(Zeroize))]
|
||||
#[cfg_attr(feature = "borsh", derive(BorshSerialize, BorshDeserialize))]
|
||||
#[cfg_attr(feature = "serde", derive(Serialize, Deserialize))]
|
||||
pub enum Slash {
|
||||
/// The slash points accumulated by this validator.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Each point is considered as `downtime_per_slash_point(validators)` downtime, where
|
||||
/// `validators` is the amount of validators present in the set.
|
||||
Points(u32),
|
||||
/// A fatal slash due to fundamentally faulty behavior.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This should only be used for misbehavior with explicit evidence of impropriety. This should
|
||||
/// not be used for liveness failures. The validator will be penalized all allocated stake.
|
||||
Fatal,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl Slash {
|
||||
/// Calculate the penalty which should be applied to the validator.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Does not panic, even due to overflows, if `allocated_stake + session_rewards <= u64::MAX`.
|
||||
pub fn penalty(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
validators: NonZero<u16>,
|
||||
allocated_stake: Amount,
|
||||
session_rewards: Amount,
|
||||
) -> Amount {
|
||||
match self {
|
||||
Self::Points(slash_points) => {
|
||||
let mut slash_points = u64::from(slash_points);
|
||||
// Do the logic with the stake in u128 to prevent overflow from multiplying u64s
|
||||
let allocated_stake = u128::from(allocated_stake.0);
|
||||
let session_rewards = u128::from(session_rewards.0);
|
||||
|
||||
// A Serai validator is allowed to be offline for an average of one day every two weeks
|
||||
// with no additional penalty. They'll solely not earn rewards for the time they were
|
||||
// offline.
|
||||
const GRACE_WINDOW: Duration = Duration::from_secs(2 * 7 * 24 * 60 * 60);
|
||||
const GRACE: Duration = Duration::from_secs(24 * 60 * 60);
|
||||
|
||||
// GRACE / GRACE_WINDOW is the fraction of the time a validator is allowed to be offline
|
||||
// This means we want SESSION_LENGTH * (GRACE / GRACE_WINDOW), but with the parentheses
|
||||
// moved so we don't incur the floordiv and hit 0
|
||||
const PENALTY_FREE_DOWNTIME: Duration = Duration::from_secs(
|
||||
(SESSION_LENGTH.as_secs() * GRACE.as_secs()) / GRACE_WINDOW.as_secs(),
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
let downtime_per_slash_point = downtime_per_slash_point(validators);
|
||||
let penalty_free_slash_points =
|
||||
PENALTY_FREE_DOWNTIME.as_secs() / downtime_per_slash_point.as_secs();
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
In practice, the following means:
|
||||
|
||||
- Hours 0-12 are penalized as if they're hours 0-12.
|
||||
- Hours 12-24 are penalized as if they're hours 12-36.
|
||||
- Hours 24-36 are penalized as if they're hours 36-96.
|
||||
- Hours 36-48 are penalized as if they're hours 96-168.
|
||||
- Hours 48-168 are penalized for 0-2% of stake.
|
||||
- 168-336 hours of slashes, for a session only lasting 168 hours, is penalized for 2-10%
|
||||
of stake.
|
||||
|
||||
This means a validator offline has to be offline for more than two days to start having
|
||||
their stake slashed.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
const MULTIPLIERS: [u64; 4] = [1, 2, 5, 6];
|
||||
let reward_slash = {
|
||||
// In intervals of the penalty-free slash points, weight the slash points accrued
|
||||
// The multiplier for the first interval is 1 as it's penalty-free
|
||||
let mut weighted_slash_points_for_reward_slash = 0;
|
||||
let mut total_possible_slash_points_for_rewards_slash = 0;
|
||||
for mult in MULTIPLIERS {
|
||||
let slash_points_in_interval = slash_points.min(penalty_free_slash_points);
|
||||
weighted_slash_points_for_reward_slash += slash_points_in_interval * mult;
|
||||
total_possible_slash_points_for_rewards_slash += penalty_free_slash_points * mult;
|
||||
slash_points -= slash_points_in_interval;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// If there are no penalty-free slash points, and the validator was slashed, slash the
|
||||
// entire reward
|
||||
(u128::from(weighted_slash_points_for_reward_slash) * session_rewards)
|
||||
.checked_div(u128::from(total_possible_slash_points_for_rewards_slash))
|
||||
.unwrap_or({
|
||||
if weighted_slash_points_for_reward_slash == 0 {
|
||||
0
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
session_rewards
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let slash_points_for_entire_session =
|
||||
SESSION_LENGTH.as_secs() / downtime_per_slash_point.as_secs();
|
||||
|
||||
let offline_slash = {
|
||||
// The amount of stake to slash for being offline
|
||||
const MAX_STAKE_SLASH_PERCENTAGE_OFFLINE: u64 = 2;
|
||||
|
||||
let stake_to_slash_for_being_offline =
|
||||
(allocated_stake * u128::from(MAX_STAKE_SLASH_PERCENTAGE_OFFLINE)) / 100;
|
||||
|
||||
// We already removed the slash points for `intervals * penalty_free_slash_points`
|
||||
let slash_points_for_reward_slash =
|
||||
penalty_free_slash_points * u64::try_from(MULTIPLIERS.len()).unwrap();
|
||||
let slash_points_for_offline_stake_slash =
|
||||
slash_points_for_entire_session.saturating_sub(slash_points_for_reward_slash);
|
||||
|
||||
let slash_points_in_interval = slash_points.min(slash_points_for_offline_stake_slash);
|
||||
slash_points -= slash_points_in_interval;
|
||||
// If there are no slash points for the entire session, don't slash stake
|
||||
// That's an extreme edge case which shouldn't start penalizing validators
|
||||
(u128::from(slash_points_in_interval) * stake_to_slash_for_being_offline)
|
||||
.checked_div(u128::from(slash_points_for_offline_stake_slash))
|
||||
.unwrap_or(0)
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let disruptive_slash = {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
A validator may have more slash points than `slash_points_for_stake_slash` if they
|
||||
didn't just accrue slashes for missing block proposals, yet also accrued slashes for
|
||||
being disruptive. In that case, we still want to bound their slash points so they can't
|
||||
somehow be slashed for 100% of their stake (which should only happen on a fatal slash).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
const MAX_STAKE_SLASH_PERCENTAGE_DISRUPTIVE: u64 = 8;
|
||||
|
||||
let stake_to_slash_for_being_disruptive =
|
||||
(allocated_stake * u128::from(MAX_STAKE_SLASH_PERCENTAGE_DISRUPTIVE)) / 100;
|
||||
// Follows the offline slash for `unwrap_or` policy
|
||||
(u128::from(slash_points.min(slash_points_for_entire_session)) *
|
||||
stake_to_slash_for_being_disruptive)
|
||||
.checked_div(u128::from(slash_points_for_entire_session))
|
||||
.unwrap_or(0)
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// The penalty is all slashes, but never more than the validator's balance
|
||||
// (handles any rounding errors which may or may not exist)
|
||||
let penalty_u128 =
|
||||
(reward_slash + offline_slash + disruptive_slash).min(allocated_stake + session_rewards);
|
||||
// saturating_into
|
||||
Amount(u64::try_from(penalty_u128).unwrap_or(u64::MAX))
|
||||
}
|
||||
// On fatal slash, their entire stake is removed
|
||||
Self::Fatal => Amount(allocated_stake.0 + session_rewards.0),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Debug, Encode, Decode, TypeInfo, MaxEncodedLen)]
|
||||
#[cfg_attr(feature = "serde", derive(Serialize, Deserialize))]
|
||||
pub struct SlashReport(pub BoundedVec<Slash, ConstU32<{ MAX_KEY_SHARES_PER_SET_U32 }>>);
|
||||
|
||||
// This is assumed binding to the ValidatorSet via the key signed with
|
||||
pub fn report_slashes_message(slashes: &SlashReport) -> Vec<u8> {
|
||||
(b"ValidatorSets-report_slashes", slashes).encode()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_penalty() {
|
||||
for validators in [1, 50, 100, crate::MAX_KEY_SHARES_PER_SET] {
|
||||
let validators = NonZero::new(validators).unwrap();
|
||||
// 12 hours of slash points should only decrease the rewards proportionately
|
||||
let twelve_hours_of_slash_points =
|
||||
u32::try_from((12 * 60 * 60) / downtime_per_slash_point(validators).as_secs()).unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
Slash::Points(twelve_hours_of_slash_points).penalty(
|
||||
validators,
|
||||
Amount(u64::MAX),
|
||||
Amount(168)
|
||||
),
|
||||
Amount(12)
|
||||
);
|
||||
// 24 hours of slash points should be counted as 36 hours
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
Slash::Points(2 * twelve_hours_of_slash_points).penalty(
|
||||
validators,
|
||||
Amount(u64::MAX),
|
||||
Amount(168)
|
||||
),
|
||||
Amount(36)
|
||||
);
|
||||
// 36 hours of slash points should be counted as 96 hours
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
Slash::Points(3 * twelve_hours_of_slash_points).penalty(
|
||||
validators,
|
||||
Amount(u64::MAX),
|
||||
Amount(168)
|
||||
),
|
||||
Amount(96)
|
||||
);
|
||||
// 48 hours of slash points should be counted as 168 hours
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
Slash::Points(4 * twelve_hours_of_slash_points).penalty(
|
||||
validators,
|
||||
Amount(u64::MAX),
|
||||
Amount(168)
|
||||
),
|
||||
Amount(168)
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// A full week of slash points should slash 2%
|
||||
let week_of_slash_points = 14 * twelve_hours_of_slash_points;
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
Slash::Points(week_of_slash_points).penalty(validators, Amount(1000), Amount(168)),
|
||||
Amount(20 + 168)
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Two weeks of slash points should slash 10%
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
Slash::Points(2 * week_of_slash_points).penalty(validators, Amount(1000), Amount(168)),
|
||||
Amount(100 + 168)
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Anything greater should still only slash 10%
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
Slash::Points(u32::MAX).penalty(validators, Amount(1000), Amount(168)),
|
||||
Amount(100 + 168)
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn no_overflow() {
|
||||
Slash::Points(u32::MAX).penalty(
|
||||
NonZero::new(u16::MAX).unwrap(),
|
||||
Amount(u64::MAX),
|
||||
Amount(u64::MAX),
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
Slash::Points(u32::MAX).penalty(NonZero::new(1).unwrap(), Amount(u64::MAX), Amount(u64::MAX));
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user