Consolidate FROST testing code

This commit is contained in:
Luke Parker
2022-04-28 21:47:25 -04:00
parent 777bb3df34
commit 8821eb0984
3 changed files with 96 additions and 73 deletions

View File

@@ -5,18 +5,10 @@ use curve25519_dalek::{constants::ED25519_BASEPOINT_TABLE, scalar::Scalar};
use monero_serai::{random_scalar, Commitment, frost::MultisigError, key_image, clsag};
#[cfg(feature = "multisig")]
use ::frost::sign;
#[cfg(feature = "multisig")]
mod frost;
#[cfg(feature = "multisig")]
use crate::frost::generate_keys;
#[cfg(feature = "multisig")]
const THRESHOLD: usize = 5;
#[cfg(feature = "multisig")]
const PARTICIPANTS: usize = 8;
use crate::frost::{THRESHOLD, PARTICIPANTS, generate_keys, sign};
const RING_INDEX: u8 = 3;
const RING_LEN: u64 = 11;
@@ -62,7 +54,7 @@ fn test_single() {
#[cfg(feature = "multisig")]
#[test]
fn test_multisig() -> Result<(), MultisigError> {
let (keys, group_private) = generate_keys(THRESHOLD, PARTICIPANTS);
let (keys, group_private) = generate_keys();
let t = keys[0].params().t();
let mut images = vec![];
@@ -102,59 +94,26 @@ fn test_multisig() -> Result<(), MultisigError> {
ring.push([&dest * &ED25519_BASEPOINT_TABLE, Commitment::new(mask, amount).calculate()]);
}
let mut machines = vec![];
let mut commitments = Vec::with_capacity(PARTICIPANTS + 1);
commitments.resize(PARTICIPANTS + 1, None);
for i in 1 ..= t {
machines.push(
sign::StateMachine::new(
sign::Params::new(
clsag::Multisig::new(
&mut ChaCha12Rng::seed_from_u64(1),
msg,
clsag::Input::new(image, ring.clone(), RING_INDEX, Commitment::new(randomness, AMOUNT)).unwrap()
).unwrap(),
keys[i - 1].clone(),
&(1 ..= t).collect::<Vec<usize>>()
).unwrap()
)
);
commitments[i] = Some(machines[i - 1].preprocess(&mut OsRng).unwrap());
}
let mut shares = Vec::with_capacity(PARTICIPANTS + 1);
shares.resize(PARTICIPANTS + 1, None);
for i in 1 ..= t {
shares[i] = Some(
machines[i - 1].sign(
&commitments
.iter()
.enumerate()
.map(|(idx, value)| if idx == i { None } else { value.to_owned() })
.collect::<Vec<Option<Vec<u8>>>>(),
&vec![]
let mut algorithms = Vec::with_capacity(t);
for _ in 1 ..= t {
algorithms.push(
clsag::Multisig::new(
&mut ChaCha12Rng::seed_from_u64(1),
msg,
clsag::Input::new(image, ring.clone(), RING_INDEX, Commitment::new(randomness, AMOUNT)).unwrap()
).unwrap()
);
}
let mut signature = None;
for i in 1 ..= t {
// Multisig does call verify to ensure integrity upon complete, before checking individual key
// shares. For FROST Schnorr, it's cheaper. For CLSAG, it may be more expensive? Yet it ensures
// we have usable signatures, not just signatures we think are usable
let sig = machines[i - 1].complete(
&shares
.iter()
.enumerate()
.map(|(idx, value)| if idx == i { None } else { value.to_owned() })
.collect::<Vec<Option<Vec<u8>>>>()
).unwrap();
if signature.is_none() {
signature = Some(sig.clone());
}
// Check the commitment out and the non-decoy s scalar are identical to every other signature
assert_eq!(sig.1, signature.as_ref().unwrap().1);
assert_eq!(sig.0.s[RING_INDEX as usize], signature.as_ref().unwrap().0.s[RING_INDEX as usize]);
let mut signatures = sign(algorithms, keys);
let signature = signatures.swap_remove(0);
for s in 0 .. (t - 1) {
// Verify the commitments and the non-decoy s scalar are identical to every other signature
// FROST will already have called verify on the produced signature, before checking individual
// key shares. For FROST Schnorr, it's cheaper. For CLSAG, it may be more expensive? Yet it
// ensures we have usable signatures, not just signatures we think are usable
assert_eq!(signatures[s].1, signature.1);
assert_eq!(signatures[s].0.s[RING_INDEX as usize], signature.0.s[RING_INDEX as usize]);
}
Ok(())