absolutebi/serai
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/serai-dex/serai.git synced 2025-12-08 20:29:23 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add helper methods

Browse Source 
Has fetched blocks checked to be the indexed blocks. Has scanned outputs be
sorted, meaning they aren't subject to implicit order/may be non-deterministic
(such as if handled by a threadpool).
This commit is contained in:
Luke Parker
2024-08-26 23:15:19 -04:00
parent b65dbacd6a
commit 7e71840822
5 changed files with 63 additions and 50 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

23
processor/scanner/src/scan.rs
View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ use primitives::{OutputType, ReceivedOutput, Block};
use crate::{
lifetime::LifetimeStage,
db::{OutputWithInInstruction, ScannerDb},
ScannerFeed, AddressFor, OutputFor, ContinuallyRan,
BlockExt, ScannerFeed, AddressFor, OutputFor, ContinuallyRan,
};
// Construct an InInstruction from an external output.
@@ -76,24 +76,7 @@ impl<D: Db, S: ScannerFeed> ContinuallyRan for ScanForOutputsTask<D, S> {
.expect("ScanForOutputsTask run before writing the start block");
for b in next_to_scan ..= latest_scannable {
let block = match self.feed.block_by_number(b).await {
Ok(block) => block,
Err(e) => Err(format!("couldn't fetch block {b}: {e:?}"))?,
};
// Check the ID of this block is the expected ID
{
let expected =
ScannerDb::<S>::block_id(&self.db, b).expect("scannable block didn't have its ID saved");
if block.id() != expected {
panic!(
"finalized chain reorganized from {} to {} at {}",
hex::encode(expected),
hex::encode(block.id()),
b
);
}
}
let block = self.feed.block_by_number(b).await?;
log::info!("scanning block: {} ({b})", hex::encode(block.id()));
@@ -143,7 +126,7 @@ impl<D: Db, S: ScannerFeed> ContinuallyRan for ScanForOutputsTask<D, S> {
worthwhile, and even if they're not economically, they are technically).
The alternative, we drop outputs here with a generic filter rule and then report back
the insolvency created, still doesn't work as we'd only be creating if an insolvency if
the insolvency created, still doesn't work as we'd only be creating an insolvency if
the output was actually made by us (and not simply someone else sending in). We can
have the Eventuality task report the insolvency, yet that requires the scanner be
responsible for such filter logic. It's more flexible, and has a cleaner API,